There comes a point in almost every business where hiring feels like the obvious next step.
For some people, it happens because the business is growing faster than they expected. What started as something they could comfortably manage has gradually become something that fills every available hour. New enquiries become new clients, new clients become more work, and before long the days start feeling full before they've even begun.
For others, it's less about growth and more about survival. The business is still moving forward, but only because they're constantly filling the gaps. Every late night, every weekend and every "I'll just quickly finish this" becomes part of keeping everything afloat.
Eventually, one thought keeps coming back.
"I think I need to hire someone."
At face value, it seems like a perfectly reasonable conclusion.
After all, if one person can't keep up anymore, surely the answer is adding another person.
Sometimes, that's exactly the right decision.
But sometimes...
It's the wrong solution to the right problem.
Why Hiring Feels Like The Next Step
Most business owners don't wake up one morning and decide it's time to recruit.
It's usually the result of hundreds of small decisions that slowly accumulate over time.
You say yes to another client.
You add another service.
You keep ownership of another decision because it's quicker than explaining it.
You continue doing tasks you've simply always done because changing them feels harder than just getting on with it.
None of those decisions feel particularly significant on their own.
Together, they create a business that's asking more of you than it ever has before.
That's often when hiring starts feeling less like an opportunity and more like a necessity.
But feeling stretched doesn't automatically mean your business needs another person.
It simply tells you something needs to change.
The question is...
What?
Before You Recruit, Pause
One of the biggest mistakes we see isn't hiring the wrong person.
It's hiring before you've identified what's actually creating the pressure.
Because another person can absolutely solve a workload problem.
They can't automatically solve:
✖️A business that depends on you for every decision
✖️Unclear responsibilities
✖️Poor systems
✖️Constant interruptions
✖️A lack of ownership within the team
✖️A role that was never clearly defined in the first place
Hiring is one of the biggest investments you'll make in your business.
Not just financially.
You're also investing:
✔️Your time
✔️Your leadership
✔️Your knowledge
✔️Your systems
✔️Your energy
✔️Your trust
That's why we don't believe recruitment starts with a job advertisement.
We believe it starts with a conversation.
Because before you decide who you need...
You first need to understand what your business actually needs.
What Problem Are You Actually Trying To Solve?
This is probably the most important question in the entire hiring process.
Not...
"What tasks will they do?"
But...
"What problem am I actually trying to solve by hiring someone?"
They're two very different conversations.
When most business owners reach the point of considering another hire, it's usually because something doesn't feel sustainable anymore.
The business is still growing, but the enjoyment often starts to disappear.
Instead of feeling excited every time a new enquiry lands in your inbox, you find yourself wondering where you're going to fit it in.
The opportunities are still there, but your capacity to take advantage of them is becoming increasingly limited.
The natural conclusion is that another person will create the breathing room you're looking for.
After all, if there's more work than you can comfortably manage, surely adding another set of hands is the logical next step.
Sometimes that's exactly what your business needs.
But sometimes, hiring becomes the answer simply because it's the only solution we've stopped to consider.
The mistake isn't deciding to hire.
The mistake is assuming that because you're feeling overwhelmed, another person must be the answer.
Before you decide whether your business needs another employee, contractor or support person, you first need to understand what's actually creating the pressure.
Otherwise, you're trying to solve the symptom instead of the cause, and those are rarely the same thing.
Not Every Business Problem Is A Hiring Problem
This is where we often see businesses spend money they didn't actually need to spend.
The pressure they're feeling is real.
The long hours are real.
The frustration is real.
But that doesn't automatically mean recruitment is the solution.
Sometimes you've genuinely reached the point where there's simply more work than your current team can realistically complete.
Demand has increased, opportunities are consistently coming through the door and everyone is already working at capacity.
In those situations, hiring is often exactly the right next step because the business has outgrown the resources currently available to it.
We've also worked with businesses where, on the surface, it looked exactly the same.
The owner was working long hours, everything felt urgent and they were convinced another person would solve the problem.
Once we started asking questions, a very different picture emerged.
Every proposal still needed their approval.
Every client wanted to speak directly with them.
Every team member came to them before making a decision.
Every problem landed on their desk before anyone else had attempted to solve it.
Adding another employee wasn't going to change any of those behaviours.
It simply would've introduced another person into a business that already depended too heavily on one individual.
The workload may have shifted slightly, but the dependency would've remained exactly the same.
That's why we believe recruitment should always start with diagnosis before solution.
Capacity And Dependency Aren't The Same Thing
One of the reasons this can be difficult to identify is because capacity problems and dependency problems often feel exactly the same.
Both leave you feeling busy.
Both leave you feeling overwhelmed.
Both leave you convinced that you need another person.
But they're created by very different things.
A capacity problem exists when there's genuinely more work than your current team can complete.
The business has grown, demand has increased and there simply aren't enough people available to deliver the work.
That's a resource problem, and hiring another person is often the right way to solve it.
A dependency problem is different.
The business may already have enough people. It may even have highly capable people.
Yet every important decision, approval, client conversation or unexpected issue still finds its way back to the owner.
The business isn't short on people. It's become reliant on one person.
Understanding which of those situations you're actually facing changes everything.
Because one requires another hire.
The other requires a different way of leading.
What Does Success Actually Look Like?
Before we talk about job titles, hours or position descriptions, there's another question we like clients to think about.
"If this person has been in the business for six months, what should be different?"
Notice the question isn't asking what they'll be doing.
It's asking what success looks like.
Those aren't the same thing.
Many business owners immediately start listing tasks.
They'll manage the inbox.
They'll answer the phones.
They'll prepare proposals.
They'll schedule appointments.
Those are all activities.
But activities don't tell you whether the hire has actually been successful.
A much more valuable answer focuses on outcomes.
Perhaps success means you're able to finish work before school pick-up three days a week.
Perhaps it means you've created enough capacity to take on another ten clients.
Perhaps it means you finally have time to work on the business instead of spending every day working in it.
Or perhaps it simply means you're no longer sitting at your laptop at 9 o'clock every night trying to catch up on everything that didn't fit into the day.
Once you become clear on the outcome you're trying to create, it's much easier to determine whether another person is actually the right solution, or whether that outcome could be achieved in a completely different way.
Could Something Else Solve The Problem?
One of the biggest advantages of taking the time to properly diagnose the problem is that it opens the door to solutions you may not have otherwise considered.
When we're feeling overwhelmed, it's natural to become fixated on the first solution that comes to mind.
For many business owners, that's hiring. It feels proactive. It feels like progress.
It feels like the next logical milestone in growing the business.
But hiring isn't the only way to create capacity.
Sometimes it's the best solution.
Sometimes it's one of several.
Before committing to another salary, another onboarding process and another person depending on your leadership, it's worth asking whether the outcome you're trying to achieve could be created another way.
For example, if you're spending hours every week on repetitive administration, does that work actually require another employee?
Or could it be simplified through automation?
If you're constantly answering the same questions from your team, is the issue really a lack of people?
Or is it that the business hasn't created enough clarity for people to confidently make decisions without you?
If you're drowning in client work, is another employee the answer?
Or have your service offerings gradually expanded to the point where you're delivering far more than your pricing ever anticipated?
Sometimes the answer is another person.
Sometimes it's a better system.
Sometimes it's redefining responsibilities.
Sometimes it's stopping work that never should've become your responsibility in the first place.
The important thing is making that decision intentionally, rather than assuming recruitment is the only path forward.
The Cheapest Hire Isn't Always The Best Hire
Once a business owner decides they do genuinely need another person, another trap often appears.
The temptation to hire based on cost.
It's understandable.
Recruitment is an investment, and particularly in small business, every dollar matters.
Looking at salary expectations can be confronting, especially if it's your first hire or you're trying to manage cash flow carefully.
But focusing purely on what someone costs often means overlooking what they're actually contributing.
A less experienced employee may have a lower salary, but they'll usually require more training, more supervision and more of your time before they're operating independently.
A more experienced person may command a higher hourly rate, but they may also step in faster, solve problems independently and require significantly less support.
Neither option is automatically better.
It depends entirely on what your business actually needs.
That's another reason we spend so much time understanding the business before we ever start advertising a role.
Because recruitment isn't simply about finding someone within a budget.
It's about finding someone who creates the outcome you're actually looking for.
It's Not About Filling A Position
This is probably one of the biggest differences between how we approach recruitment and how many people think about recruitment.
We don't start by asking,
"What position do you want to advertise?"
We start by asking,
"What are you trying to achieve?"
There's a big difference.
One business owner might tell us they need an administration assistant.
After a conversation, we realise they actually need an operations coordinator because the problem isn't administration. It's coordination.
Another might ask us to recruit a full-time employee.
After exploring the workload, it becomes obvious that a contractor for two days a week would solve exactly the same problem while giving the business much more flexibility.
Someone else may come to us convinced they need a second manager.
Instead, we discover they already have capable people in the business. They simply haven't created enough clarity around expectations, authority and ownership for those people to step up.
On paper, all three businesses came looking for recruitment.
In reality, they needed completely different solutions.
That's why we believe good recruitment starts long before the advertisement is written.
It starts with understanding the business.
Because when you understand the business, finding the right person becomes significantly easier.
Finding the wrong person becomes much less likely.
And perhaps most importantly, you avoid hiring someone to solve a problem they were never going to be able to fix.
Before You Advertise...
If you're starting to think about growing your team, we'd encourage you to pause for just a few minutes before opening Seek or drafting a position description.
Ask yourself:
❔What problem am I actually trying to solve?
❔Is this a workload problem, or is it a leadership problem?
❔What outcome am I hoping this person creates?
❔Could that outcome be achieved another way?
❔If I hired someone tomorrow, what would I want to be different six months from now?
Those questions might not change your decision to hire.
In fact, they may confirm that recruitment is exactly the right next step.
But if that's the conclusion you reach, you'll move into the recruitment process with far more clarity.
You'll know what success looks like.
You'll know why you're hiring.
And you'll be far more likely to find someone who genuinely helps move your business forward, rather than simply becoming another person to manage.
Because recruitment isn't about adding another person to your business.
It's about intentionally building a business that's capable of growing beyond you.
And that's a very different conversation.
Ash + Emerald HQ 💎
Comments